ReviewChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Dexmedetomidine: Shifting Paradigms in Neonatal Sedation and Pain Control.
Review in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dexmedetomidine for LISA procedure: a prospective observational single center experience.Italian journal of pediatrics · 2026Observational
- Differential effects of propofol and dexmedetomidine on explicit and implicit memory after sedation: a retrospective study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Enhancing Caudal Analgesia in Children: A Narrative Review of Clonidine and Dexmedetomidine as Adjuvants.Cureus · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNewborns, including preterm infants, are capable of responding to pain. Recurrent pain exposure is associated with suboptimal motor development, cognitive impairments, abnormal brain growth, and maladapted nociceptive reactions. PROBLEM: Current agents, primarily opioids and benzodiazepines, raise major concerns due to their adverse effects, including insufficient sedation or analgesia, withdrawal, depressed respiratory effort, tolerance, and occasional paradoxical agitation. Commonly used drugs such as midazolam and morphine have been shown to induce neuroapoptosis and neurodevelopmental abnormalities in animal studies. Evaluation-Dexmedetomidine: As a specific alpha-2 adrenergic agonist, dexmedetomidine causes a significantly lower reduction in breathing effort. It has over 800 times greater affinity for alpha-2 receptors compared to alpha-1 receptors. Common side effects include bradycardia and hypotension. Prolonged use may necessitate a transition to clonidine during the weaning process. Dexmedetomidine can be administered intravenously as a bolus or infusion or intranasally. Indications include sedation and analgesia for mechanical ventilation, therapeutic hypothermia, procedural premedication, and as an adjunct to inhalational anesthesia and nerve-blocking agents. Research across varying age groups has demonstrated that dexmedetomidine shortens periods of invasive ventilation and decreases the need for other sedatives. Neonatal studies suggest that dexmedetomidine may help accelerate the achievement of full enteral feeds and can be safely administered within specific dosage ranges without causing significant adverse events that would necessitate abrupt discontinuation.
conclusionsDexmedetomidine can be used alone or in combination with other agents. By increasing the use of dexmedetomidine, it is possible to reduce the dosage of concurrent medications, thereby minimizing the risk of complications while still achieving the desired sedation and analgesia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.