ReviewChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Emotion Regulation in Pediatric Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder and Related Interventions: A Scoping Review.
Review in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesMaladaptive emotion regulation (ER) and emotion dysregulation (ED) have long been associated with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) as etiological and maintaining factors. Despite building interest in the field along with ancillary research into "rage OCD" (likely an example of ED), targeting the relationship between OCD and ER/ED has been understudied in pediatric OCD populations. The aim of this review was to elucidate the current state of the literature regarding ER/ED, its relationship to pediatric OCD, and related interventions.
methodsA scoping review examined how ER/ED are related to OCD, particularly in pediatric populations, and the efficacy of interventions to affect ER/ED for youth, with a focus on youth diagnosed with OCD.
resultsA total of 182 publications were reviewed. While not always consistent, a majority of studies found a significant relationship between measures of ER or ED and OCD broadly, as well as with specific OCD symptom dimensions. A number of previously existing interventions, adaptations of those interventions, and newly presented interventions were found to affect ER/ED in youth; however, few studies have effectively targeted ER/ED for pediatric OCD, specifically. As such, the mechanism of change is not well understood.
conclusionsFindings from this review suggest that the increasing focus on ER/ED in pediatric OCD is warranted and in need of continued research. ER/ED can be effectively changed by interventions in youth, but the role ER/ED-change plays in pediatric OCD symptom improvement remains unclear. Implications for future study are examined.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.