ArticleASAIO journal (American Society for Artificial Internal Organs : 1992)2025
High-Granularity Machine Learning Prediction of Acute Brain Injury in Patients Receiving Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.
Article in ASAIO journal (American Society for Artificial Internal Organs : 1992), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Acute brain injury (ABI) is prevalent among patients undergoing venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) and significantly impact recovery. Early prediction of ABI could enable timely interventions to prevent adverse outcomes, but existing predictive methods remain suboptimal. This study aimed to enhance ABI prediction using machine learning (ML) models and high-temporal-resolution granular data. We retrospectively analyzed 355 VA-ECMO patients treated at Johns Hopkins Hospital (JHH) from 2016 to 2024, collecting over 3 million data points from the JHH Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) database, with an average of 80,000 data points per patient. Acute brain injury was defined as ischemic stroke, intracranial hemorrhage, hypoxic-ischemic brain injury, or seizure. Four ML models were used: Random Forest, Categorical Boosting, Adaptive Boosting, and Extreme Gradient Boosting. Among 355 patients (median age 59 years, 56.9% male), 13.5% developed ABI. The models achieved an optimal area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.79, accuracy of 87%, sensitivity of 53%, specificity of 99%, and precision-recall (PR)-AUC of 0.47. Key predictors included high minimum values of systolic blood pressure and variability in on-ECMO pulse pressure. High-resolution granular data enhanced ML performance for ABI prediction. Future efforts should focus on integrating continuous data platforms to enable real-time monitoring and personalized care, optimizing patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.