Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40309965›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2025

Multi-Metric Approach for the Comparison of Denoising Techniques for Resting-State fMRI.

Federica Goffi, Anna Maria Bianchi, Giandomenico Schiena, Paolo Brambilla, Eleonora Maggioni

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Federica GoffiDepartment of Electronics Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0009-0009-4313-3683
Anna Maria BianchiDepartment of Electronics Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8290-7460
Giandomenico SchienaDepartment of Neurosciences and Mental Health, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5589-8071
Paolo BrambillaDepartment of Neurosciences and Mental Health, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4021-8456
Eleonora MaggioniDepartment of Electronics Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4331-4029

Funding

Fondazione Cariplo 2019-3416Ministero della Salute CUP: C43C22001630001/MI-0117Ministero della Salute GR-2018-12367789Ministero della Salute PNC-E3-2022-23683266Ministero della Salute RicercaCorrente2024Ministero dell'Università e della Ricerca 2022RXM3H7Ministero dell'Università e della Ricerca Dipartimenti di Eccellenza Program 2023-2027Ministero dell'Università e della Ricerca P20229MFRC
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the increasing use of resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) data for studying the spontaneous functional interactions within the brain, the achievement of robust results is often hampered by insufficient data quality and by poor knowledge of the most effective denoising methods. The present study aims to define an appropriate denoising strategy for rs-fMRI data by proposing a robust framework for the quantitative and comprehensive comparison of the performance of multiple pipelines made available by the newly proposed HALFpipe software. This will ultimately contribute to standardizing rs-fMRI preprocessing and denoising steps. Fifty-three participants took part in the study by undergoing a rs-fMRI session. Synthetic rs-fMRI data from one subject were also generated. Nine different denoising pipelines were applied in parallel to the minimally preprocessed fMRI data. The comparison was conducted by computing previously proposed and novel metrics that quantify the degree of artifact removal, signal enhancement, and resting-state network identifiability. A summary performance index, accounting for both noise removal and information preservation, was proposed. The results confirm the performance heterogeneity of different denoising pipelines across the different quality metrics. In both real and synthetic data, the summary performance index favored the denoising strategy including the regression of mean signals from white matter and cerebrospinal fluid brain areas and global signal. This pipeline resulted in the best compromise between artifact removal and preservation of the information on resting-state networks. Our study provided useful methodological tools and key information on the effectiveness of multiple denoising strategies for rs-fMRI data. Besides providing a robust comparison approach that could be adapted to other fMRI studies, a suitable denoising pipeline for rs-fMRI data was identified, which could be used to improve the reproducibility of rs-fMRI findings.

Indexed as

ArtifactsBrainConnectomeImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingNerve NetAdultFemaleHumansMaleYoung Adultbenchmarkingdenoising pipelinefunctional magnetic resonance imagingpreprocessingresting state

Identifiers

PMID40309965
PMCPMC12044599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.