ArticleHuman brain mapping2025
Multi-Metric Approach for the Comparison of Denoising Techniques for Resting-State fMRI.
Article in Human brain mapping, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Brain-heart interactions in late-onset major depressive disorder revealed by multimodal HRV-driven fMRI.Communications biology · 2026Article
- Derivation of machine learning brain aging biomarkers for a set of forty thousand functional connectomes.Brain research bulletin · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite the increasing use of resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) data for studying the spontaneous functional interactions within the brain, the achievement of robust results is often hampered by insufficient data quality and by poor knowledge of the most effective denoising methods. The present study aims to define an appropriate denoising strategy for rs-fMRI data by proposing a robust framework for the quantitative and comprehensive comparison of the performance of multiple pipelines made available by the newly proposed HALFpipe software. This will ultimately contribute to standardizing rs-fMRI preprocessing and denoising steps. Fifty-three participants took part in the study by undergoing a rs-fMRI session. Synthetic rs-fMRI data from one subject were also generated. Nine different denoising pipelines were applied in parallel to the minimally preprocessed fMRI data. The comparison was conducted by computing previously proposed and novel metrics that quantify the degree of artifact removal, signal enhancement, and resting-state network identifiability. A summary performance index, accounting for both noise removal and information preservation, was proposed. The results confirm the performance heterogeneity of different denoising pipelines across the different quality metrics. In both real and synthetic data, the summary performance index favored the denoising strategy including the regression of mean signals from white matter and cerebrospinal fluid brain areas and global signal. This pipeline resulted in the best compromise between artifact removal and preservation of the information on resting-state networks. Our study provided useful methodological tools and key information on the effectiveness of multiple denoising strategies for rs-fMRI data. Besides providing a robust comparison approach that could be adapted to other fMRI studies, a suitable denoising pipeline for rs-fMRI data was identified, which could be used to improve the reproducibility of rs-fMRI findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.