ArticleThe Journal of experimental biology2025
Dive-by-dive variation in the diving respiratory air volume of southern elephant seals (Mirounga leonina).
Article in The Journal of experimental biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Dive-by-dive variation in the diving respiratory air volume of southern elephant seals (Mirounga leonina).The Journal of experimental biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The role of diving respiratory air volume (DRAV) in deep-diving phocid seals remains poorly understood, largely because of the lack of methods for measuring DRAV in free-ranging divers that exhale before diving. We developed a method to estimate DRAV using a hydrodynamic glide model applied to descent glides recorded using multi-sensor data loggers. We estimated dive-by-dive DRAV for six negatively buoyant female southern elephant seals (Mirounga leonina). During shallow descent glides, rapid compression of DRAV influenced net buoyancy and gliding speed, making this phase suitable for estimating DRAV. Our results revealed dive-by-dive variation in DRAV, which was positively correlated with root mean square (RMS) sway acceleration (a proxy for per-stroke effort) and the depth at which gliding began during the initial descent. DRAV increased with both tissue density and maximum dive depth, suggesting that seals adjusted their DRAV to stay closer to neutral buoyancy through their dives. However, the observed level of adjustment did not result in neutral buoyancy at half of the maximum dive depth, as predicted to minimise round-trip locomotion costs. Instead, the seals typically adjusted DRAV to reach neutral buoyancy at ∼30 m depth, <10% of their mean maximum dive depth. This indicates that strong negative tissue density imposes transit costs that cannot be fully compensated for by DRAV adjustment alone. Future work should explore whether other breath-hold divers show similar patterns of DRAV adjustment and quantify the associated physiological and ecological benefits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.