Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40309875›Full record

ReviewBrain sciences2025

Neuroplasticity and Nervous System Recovery: Cellular Mechanisms, Therapeutic Advances, and Future Prospects.

Ligia Gabriela Tataranu, Radu Eugen Rizea

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ligia Gabriela TataranuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-6788-5833
Radu Eugen RizeaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-3848-0893

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuroplasticity, the ability of the nervous system to adapt structurally and functionally in response to environmental interactions and injuries, is a cornerstone of recovery in the central (CNS) and peripheral nervous systems (PNS). This review explores the mechanisms underlying neuroplasticity, focusing on the dynamic roles of cellular and molecular processes in recovery from nervous system injuries. Key cellular players, including Schwann cells, oligodendrocytes, and neural stem cells, are highlighted for their contributions to nerve repair, myelination, and regeneration. Advances in therapeutic interventions, such as electrical stimulation, bioluminescent optogenetics, and innovative nerve grafting techniques, are discussed alongside their potential to enhance recovery and functional outcomes. The molecular underpinnings of plasticity, involving synaptic remodeling, homeostatic mechanisms, and activity-dependent regulation of gene expression, are elucidated to illustrate their role in learning, memory, and injury repair. Integrating emerging technologies and therapeutic approaches with a foundational understanding of neuroplasticity offers a pathway toward more effective strategies for restoring nervous system functionality after injury.

Indexed as

bioluminescent optogeneticsbiomaterialsneural interfacesneural networksneuroinflammationneuroprostheticsoligodendrocytessynaptic plasticity

Identifiers

PMID40309875
PMCPMC12025631

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.