ArticleBrain sciences2025
Gamma Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation Enhances Working Memory Ability in Healthy People: An EEG Microstate Study.
Article in Brain sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWorking memory (WM) is a core cognitive function closely linked to various cognitive processes including language, decision making, and reasoning. Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS), a non-invasive brain stimulation technique, has been shown to modulate cognitive abilities and treat psychiatric disorders. Although gamma tACS (γ-tACS) has demonstrated positive effects on WM, its underlying neural mechanisms remain unclear.
methodsIn this study, we employed electroencephalogram (EEG) microstate analysis to investigate the spatiotemporal dynamics of γ-tACS effects on WM performance. Healthy participants (N = 104) participated in two-back and three-back WM tasks before and after two types (sine and triangular) of γ-tACS, with sham stimulation as a control.
resultsOur results revealed that γ-tACS improved performance in both the two-back and three-back tasks, with triangular γ-tACS showing greater accuracy improvement in the three-back task than the sham group. Furthermore, γ-tACS significantly modulated EEG microstate dynamics, specifically downregulating microstate Class C and upregulating microstate Classes D and B. These changes were positively correlated with reduced reaction times in the three-back task.
conclusionsOur findings establish microstate analysis as an effective approach for evaluating γ-tACS-induced changes in global brain activity and advance the understanding of how γ-tACS influences WM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.