Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40309816›Full record

ReviewBrain sciences2025

Eye Tracking in Parkinson's Disease: A Review of Oculomotor Markers and Clinical Applications.

Pierluigi Diotaiuti, Giulio Marotta, Francesco Di Siena, Salvatore Vitiello, Francesco Di Prinzio, Angelo Rodio, Tommaso Di Libero, Lavinia Falese, Stefania Mancone

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Retinal Neurovascular Signatures in Parkinson's Disease.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Pierluigi DiotaiutiDepartment of Human Sciences, Society and Health, University of Cassino and Southern Lazio, 03043 Cassino, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5470-3233
Giulio MarottaDepartment of Human Sciences, Society and Health, University of Cassino and Southern Lazio, 03043 Cassino, Italy.
Francesco Di SienaDepartment of Human Sciences, Society and Health, University of Cassino and Southern Lazio, 03043 Cassino, Italy.
Salvatore VitielloDepartment of Human Sciences, Society and Health, University of Cassino and Southern Lazio, 03043 Cassino, Italy.
Francesco Di PrinzioDepartment of Human Sciences, Philosophy and Education, University of Salerno, 84084 Fisciano, Italy.
Angelo RodioDepartment of Human Sciences, Society and Health, University of Cassino and Southern Lazio, 03043 Cassino, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2964-7193
Tommaso Di LiberoDepartment of Human Sciences, Society and Health, University of Cassino and Southern Lazio, 03043 Cassino, Italy.ORCID 0009-0002-9064-4362
Lavinia FaleseDepartment of Human Sciences, Society and Health, University of Cassino and Southern Lazio, 03043 Cassino, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7767-6717
Stefania ManconeDepartment of Human Sciences, Society and Health, University of Cassino and Southern Lazio, 03043 Cassino, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9837-526X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background. Eye movement abnormalities are increasingly recognized as early biomarkers of Parkinson's disease (PD), reflecting both motor and cognitive dysfunction. Advances in eye-tracking technology provide objective, quantifiable measures of saccadic impairments, fixation instability, smooth pursuit deficits, and pupillary changes. These advances offer new opportunities for early diagnosis, disease monitoring, and neurorehabilitation. (2) Objective. This narrative review explores the relationship between oculomotor dysfunction and PD pathophysiology, highlighting the potential applications of eye tracking in clinical and research settings. (3) Methods. A comprehensive literature review was conducted, focusing on peer-reviewed studies examining eye movement dysfunction in PD. Relevant publications were identified through PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, using key terms, such as "eye movements in Parkinson's disease", "saccadic control and neurodegeneration", "fixation instability in PD", and "eye-tracking for cognitive assessment". Studies integrating machine learning (ML) models and VR-based interventions were also included. (4) Results. Patients with PD exhibit distinct saccadic abnormalities, including hypometric saccades, prolonged saccadic latency, and increased anti-saccade errors. These impairments correlate with executive dysfunction and disease progression. Fixation instability and altered pupillary responses further support the role of oculomotor metrics as non-invasive biomarkers. Emerging AI-driven eye-tracking models show promise for automated PD diagnosis and progression tracking. (5) Conclusions. Eye tracking provides a reliable, cost-effective tool for early PD detection, cognitive assessment, and rehabilitation. Future research should focus on standardizing clinical protocols, validating predictive AI models, and integrating eye tracking into multimodal treatment strategies.

Indexed as

cognitive impairmenteye trackingfixation instabilitymachine learningneurorehabilitationParkinson’s diseasepupillary responsesaccadic dysfunction

Identifiers

PMID40309816
PMCPMC12025636

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.