Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40309810›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics2025

Emerging human rights standards on obstetric violence and abuse during childbirth.

Camilla Pickles

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Emerging human rights standards on obstetric violence and abuse during childbirth.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Camilla PicklesDurham Law School, Durham University, Durham, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article considers emerging human rights standards relevant to obstetric violence and abuse during childbirth in healthcare facilities. It examines the evolution of "safe motherhood" from a focus on physical safety to the recognition of respectful and dignified care as a fundamental right. The analysis traces key developments from WHO, UN Special Rapporteurs, and landmark decisions from human rights bodies like the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. These decisions define obstetric violence as a form of gender-based discrimination, clarifying state obligations to prevent and address it through legislative reforms, training, effective complaint mechanisms, and remedies for victims. The present article emphasizes free and informed consent, addressing structural inequalities, and promoting respectful maternity care to protect women's reproductive rights.

Indexed as

Delivery, ObstetricGender-Based ViolenceHuman RightsMaternal Health ServicesParturitionWomen's RightsFemaleHumansInformed ConsentPregnancychildbirthdisrespect and abusehuman rightsmistreatmentobstetric violencesafe motherhoodsexual and reproductive health

Identifiers

PMID40309810
PMCPMC12177269

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.