ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2025
Approach for enhancing the accuracy of semantic segmentation of chest X-ray images by edge detection and deep learning integration.
Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pushing the limits of cardiac MRI: deep-learning based real-time cine imaging in free breathing vs breath hold.European radiology · 2026Article
- DCA-UNet: A Cross-Modal Ginkgo Crown Recognition Method Based on Multi-Source Data.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- HybridCATNet: an explainable CNN-Transformer framework with early multi-channel fusion and uncertainty estimation for pneumonia detection from chest X-rays.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- An optimization method for hemi-diaphragm measurement of dynamic chest X-ray radiography during respiration based on graphics and diaphragm motion consistency criterion.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Accurate segmentation of anatomical structures in chest X-ray images remains challenging, especially for regions with low contrast and overlapping structures. This limitation significantly affects the diagnosis of cardiothoracic diseases. Existing deep learning methods often struggle with preserving structural boundaries, leading to segmentation artifacts. Methods: To address these challenges, I propose a novel segmentation approach that integrates contour detection techniques with the U-net deep learning architecture. Specifically, the method employs Sobel and Scharr edge detection filters to enhance structural boundaries in chest X-ray images before segmentation. The pipeline involves pre-processing using contour detection, followed by segmentation with a U-net model trained to identify lungs, heart, and clavicles. Results: Experimental evaluation demonstrated that using edge-enhancing filters, particularly the Sobel operator, leads to a marked improvement in segmentation accuracy. For lung segmentation, the model achieved an accuracy of 99.26%, a Dice coefficient of 98.88%, and a Jaccard index of 97.54%. Heart segmentation results included 99.47% accuracy and 94.14% Jaccard index, while clavicle segmentation reached 99.79% accuracy and 89.57% Jaccard index. These results consistently outperform the baseline U-net model without edge enhancement. Discussion: The integration of contour detection methods with the U-net model significantly improves the segmentation quality of complex anatomical regions in chest X-rays. Among the tested filters, the Sobel operator proved to be the most effective in enhancing boundary information and reducing segmentation artifacts. This approach offers a promising direction for more accurate and robust computer-aided diagnosis systems in radiology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.