ArticleJTCVS open2025
Mitral regurgitation at the time of left ventricular assist device implantation: Should it be treated or not?
Article in JTCVS open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A monolithic patient-specific 3D-0D model for In silico investigation of hemodynamics in patients with left ventricular assist devices.Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Mitral regurgitation may persist or progress after left ventricular assist device implantation. However, whether preexisting mitral regurgitation should be corrected at the time of implantation remains to be determined. Methods: A retrospective, registry-based analysis was performed on 1398 continuous-flow left ventricular assist device recipients who underwent implantation between 2010 and 2022. Patients were compared for significant mitral regurgitation, defined as moderate-to-severe or greater mitral regurgitation after implantation, and major adverse events during left ventricular assist device support. Comparisons were made between patients untreated for mitral regurgitation but who had moderate or greater preexisting mitral regurgitation (n = 414) and those who had no or mild preexisting mitral regurgitation (n = 368) (cohort 1), and between patients with moderate or greater mitral regurgitation who underwent concomitant mitral valve surgery (n = 86) and those who did not (n = 414) (cohort 2). Results: The cumulative incidence of significant mitral regurgitation was higher in patients with untreated moderate or greater mitral regurgitation in both cohorts ( Conclusions: Significant mitral regurgitation may be prevented by concomitant surgery, but late survival and the risk of other major adverse events were not significantly improved by the procedure and were similar between patients with untreated moderate or greater mitral regurgitation and those with no or untreated mild mitral regurgitation. Our results suggest that mitral regurgitation during left ventricular assist device implantation may have only limited benefits from concomitant surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.