ArticleJTCVS open2025
Gender disparities in cardiothoracic surgical conference scholarly interactions: A prime opportunity for change in culture.
Article in JTCVS open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gender equality and equity in intensive care: an international Delphi consensus study.Intensive care medicine · 2026Review
- The Importance of Mentorship in Thoracic Surgery Residency.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to characterize the failures of professional scholarly discourse at a national cardiothoracic surgical meeting, with particular attention directed toward gender-related inequities in treatment. Methods: During the 2024 Society of Thoracic Surgery Annual Meeting, we used a standardized tool to conduct structured, real-time observations of professional behavior during meeting sessions. Fifteen observers gathered data from 22 sessions, including Plenary, Education/Quality/Wellness, General Thoracic, and Adult Cardiac Surgery. Survey items were designed to evaluate presenters', discussants', and moderators', conduct, specifically pertaining to interruptions, use of appropriate titles, and adherence to allotted presentation times. Results: Unprofessional behavior was observed in 13 of 22 (59%) studied sessions. During these sessions, 46 perpetrators were identified, among whom 38 (83%) were men and 8 (17%) were women. Women were significantly more likely to be addressed by an inappropriate title compared with men, 44% and 25%, respectively ( Conclusions: Unprofessional behavior occurred with regularity during this societal conference. Men more frequently engaged in these actions, with women being disproportionately affected. By shedding light on such issues, we can appropriately address biases and provide education regarding acceptable conduct.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.