ArticleJTCVS open2025
Preclinical experience with cisplatin, gemcitabine, and doxorubicin in pulmonary suffusion.
Article in JTCVS open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Because suffusion amplifies lung chemotherapy while limiting systemic toxicity, we tested candidate drugs for treating human lung cancers and pulmonary metastases. Methods: Immature beagle dogs underwent thoracotomy for unilateral lung suffusion of cisplatin (0.125-2 mg/kg; n = 19), doxorubicin (3.75-7.5 mg/kg; n = 7), gemcitabine (168.75 mg/kg; n = 5), or saline (n = 3). After ipsilateral lung circulation isolation and drainage, pulmonary artery chemotherapy was injected, dwelled for 30 minutes, and then aspirated. Bilateral lung biopsies and serum samples assessed delivery and leak. After lung reperfusion, animals recovered for 30 days with scheduled monitoring of vital signs, weights, and behaviors. At experiment termination, necropsy histopathologic tissue analyses assessed tolerability. Results: All 32 animals recovered, except 1 with lung torsion and 2 with pulmonary toxicity that required early euthanasia. Serum concentrations during suffusion for cisplatin (135 ng/mL), doxorubicin (undetectable), and gemcitabine (1452 ng/mL) indicated minimal systemic leakage. Cisplatin escalations showed uniform suffusion deliveries (100% fibrosis at a 100% systemic chemotherapy dose), which was then reduced to a nondamaging 25% threshold. When the equivalent dose of doxorubicin was used, toxicity occurred, but 12.5% (2.5-fold amplification of local delivery) was well tolerated. Gemcitabine, like cisplatin, caused minimal toxicity at 25% of the systemic dose (5-fold amplification). Optimized doses caused no hematologic or metabolic derangements and necropsies showed no gross organ injury other than adhesions. Histopathology demonstrated multifocal ipsilateral lung fibrotic changes without contralateral or extrapulmonary pathology. Conclusions: While suffusion delivery of the vesicant doxorubicin was tolerated less well than cisplatin and gemcitabine, all appear to be safe and feasible for human trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.