Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40309697›Full record

ArticleJTCVS open2025

Delays in phases of care from identification to treatment of suspicious lung nodules.

Nihar Rama, Rachel Nordgren, Aliya N Husain, Aditya Juloori, Christine M Bestvina, Rajat Thawani, Marina Garassino, Septimiu Murgu, Ajay Wagh, D Kyle Hogarth and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JTCVS open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Nihar RamaPritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Ill.
Rachel NordgrenDepartment of Public Health Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, Ill.
Aliya N HusainDepartment of Pathology, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Ill.
Aditya JulooriDepartment of Radiation & Cellular Oncology, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Ill.
Christine M BestvinaSection of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Ill.
Rajat ThawaniSection of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Ill.
Marina GarassinoSection of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Ill.
Septimiu MurguSection of Pulmonary/Critical Care, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Ill.
Ajay WaghSection of Pulmonary/Critical Care, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Ill.
D Kyle HogarthSection of Pulmonary/Critical Care, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Ill.
Carrie BarthSection of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Ill.
Darren BryanSection of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Ill.
Mark K FergusonSection of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Ill.
Jessica DoningtonSection of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Ill.
Maria Lucia MadariagaSection of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Ill.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Shorter time to lung cancer diagnosis and treatment is associated with improved outcomes. We analyzed the time spent from nodule identification to treatment to identify targets for improving the timeliness of suspicious lung nodule care in a diverse patient population. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients with suspicious lung nodules (suspected clinical stage I/II primary lung cancer) at a single academic medical center (2020-2022). Patients with suspected stage III/IV or nonprimary lung cancers were excluded. Multivariable Cox regressions were performed to assess factors associated with timeliness of care. Results: Of 157 patients, 59% were female, 53% were Black, and mean age was 70 ± 8.6 years. Nodules were identified incidentally (52%) or via screening (48%). Treatment was surgery in 52% and stereotactic body radiotherapy in 44%, and 10.2% were benign. Median (interquartile range) times from referral to diagnosis and from referral to treatment were 34 (22-56) days and 65 (44-84) days, respectively. Consultation to biopsy (20 [12-34] days) and diagnosis to treatment (28 [8-43] days) were the longest phases of care. Longer time from referral to diagnosis was associated with Black race and widowed status, whereas longer time from referral to treatment was associated with female gender, widowed status, frailty, body mass index greater than 18.5, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status less than 2, bronchoscopic biopsy, and treatment with stereotactic body radiotherapy. Conclusions: Increased time spent in suspicious lung nodule care is associated with demographic, social, and clinical factors. The longest phases are time from consultation to biopsy and from diagnosis to treatment. Improving multidisciplinary care coordination for vulnerable patient populations could improve the timeliness of suspicious lung nodule care.

Indexed as

delays in carelung cancerphases of careracial disparitiesthoracic surgery

Identifiers

PMID40309697
PMCPMC12039447

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.