ArticleJTCVS open2025
Delays in phases of care from identification to treatment of suspicious lung nodules.
Article in JTCVS open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Risk prediction models for postoperative atrial fibrillation in patients with lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Shorter time to lung cancer diagnosis and treatment is associated with improved outcomes. We analyzed the time spent from nodule identification to treatment to identify targets for improving the timeliness of suspicious lung nodule care in a diverse patient population. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients with suspicious lung nodules (suspected clinical stage I/II primary lung cancer) at a single academic medical center (2020-2022). Patients with suspected stage III/IV or nonprimary lung cancers were excluded. Multivariable Cox regressions were performed to assess factors associated with timeliness of care. Results: Of 157 patients, 59% were female, 53% were Black, and mean age was 70 ± 8.6 years. Nodules were identified incidentally (52%) or via screening (48%). Treatment was surgery in 52% and stereotactic body radiotherapy in 44%, and 10.2% were benign. Median (interquartile range) times from referral to diagnosis and from referral to treatment were 34 (22-56) days and 65 (44-84) days, respectively. Consultation to biopsy (20 [12-34] days) and diagnosis to treatment (28 [8-43] days) were the longest phases of care. Longer time from referral to diagnosis was associated with Black race and widowed status, whereas longer time from referral to treatment was associated with female gender, widowed status, frailty, body mass index greater than 18.5, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status less than 2, bronchoscopic biopsy, and treatment with stereotactic body radiotherapy. Conclusions: Increased time spent in suspicious lung nodule care is associated with demographic, social, and clinical factors. The longest phases are time from consultation to biopsy and from diagnosis to treatment. Improving multidisciplinary care coordination for vulnerable patient populations could improve the timeliness of suspicious lung nodule care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.