ArticleJTCVS open2025
Young lung cancer patients undergoing surgery: Comparison of clinicopathological characteristics and outcomes in patients aged ≤50 years versus >50 years.
Article in JTCVS open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Young lung cancer: from diagnosis to survivorship.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: We investigated clinicopathologic characteristics, overall survival (OS), and locoregional recurrence-free survival of young surgical patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Methods: Retrospective review of an institutional database of patients aged 50 years or younger undergoing resection for non-small cell lung cancer between January 1995 and March 2022. A control group of patients older than age 50 years was selected by stratified random sampling. Relevant characteristics were compared with Wilcoxon rank sum,χ, Results: We identified 196 patients aged 50 years or younger and 232 patients older than age 50 years. Median age was 46 years (interquartile range, 43-49 years) in the younger group and 69 years (interquartile range, 63-74 years) in the older group. Younger patients were more often women, non-White, and with fewer comorbidities. They more often presented with symptoms, stage III or IV disease, and more often received neoadjuvant therapy. In unweighted analysis, younger patients showed superior OS (log-rank Conclusions: Recognizing lung cancer as a differential diagnosis for patients aged 50 years or younger is crucial because this group shows superior outcomes for stage I disease. Lymphovascular invasion is an independent prognostic risk factor across age groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.