ReviewHealth science reports2025
Pre-Percutaneous Coronary Intervention C-Reactive Protein Levels and In-Stent Restenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in Health science reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Inflammatory Response After Elective PCI and Subsequent Outcomes in Stable Coronary Artery Disease.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Inflammation and Immune Mediators in the Context of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Implications for Therapeutics.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Pre-procedural C-reactive protein levels and carotid or intracranial artery restenosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Atherosclerosis plus · 2026Article
- Systemic Inflammation in Retinal Vein Occlusion and Its Role in Clinical Outcomes of Secondary Macular Edema.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: C-reactive protein (CRP) is an inflammatory biomarker, implicated in the pathogenesis of atherosclerotic lesion formation, plaque rupture, and coronary thrombosis. The relationship between preprocedural CRP levels and subsequent development of in-stent restenosis (ISR) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) however remains uncertain. Against this background, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis, investigating the association between baseline CRP levels and the incidence of ISR after PCI. Methods: Relevant published studies were identified following a PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Scopus and Web of Knowledge databases search until April 30, 2024. To be included, studies had to be original research with: (i) angiographically determined ISR group, (ii) angiographically or clinically determined no-ISR group, and (iii) CRP levels measured before the index PCI procedure for both groups. The mean difference in baseline CRP levels and associated 95% confidence interval (CI) between the ISR and no-ISR groups was ascertained for each included study. The pooled standard mean difference (SMD) and its 95% CI was derived after pooling study-level results using a random effects model, employing a Results: Out of a total of 1018 unique results, 19 studies, with a total sample size of 4744 patients (1154 restenosis cases/3590 controls), were included for quantitative synthesis. ISR group had higher baseline CRP levels (SMD = 0.41, 95% CI = 0.16, 0.66 mg/L, Conclusions: The present systematic review and meta-analysis suggests a significant association of elevated pre-PCI CRP with subsequent angiographically confirmed ISR. These results warrant further validation in dedicated large cohorts, ideally in a prospective setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.