ArticleHealth science reports2025
Evaluation of an Electronic Application for Enhancing Medication Adherence Among Hypertensive Patients: A Qualitative Research Based on Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).
Article in Health science reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Tailoring implementation strategies for acute coronary syndrome quality improvement program at primary care level in east, west, and central China.Health policy and planning · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Patient adherence plays a crucial role in effective chronic disease management. eHealth interventions utilizing smartphone applications (apps) are emerging as a promising approach to support adherence. This study aims to explore the acceptability, usability, perceived benefits, and barriers by app users, both with or without chronic diseases. Methods: In-depth interviews were conducted with 12 Cantonese-speaking patients aged 40 years or above who were eHealth app users. Participants' perceptions of the app, their preferences, and the impact on health outcomes were analyzed using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Results: Participants had positive perceptions and understanding of the app, with a majority preferring "My eDrug Manager" over other similar apps. Monitoring medication and blood pressure improved user habits, while medication details and various reminder styles enhanced patient adherence. However, participants emphasized the need for efficient technical improvements and timely customer support. Some users found the app incompatible for disabled patients, while others desired comprehensive, customizable features adaptable to individual needs. Varying levels of interactivity required by users had the potential to negatively impact their perceptions of the app. Conclusion: This study provides insights into the benefits and concerns regarding user intention to adopt the eHealth app. Participants suggested improvements for different reminder styles and comprehensive health reports. Findings can inform policy makers about the current situation and how implementing user feedback could increase app usage, medication adherence, and ultimately improve individual health outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.