Trial reportWorld journal of psychiatry2025
Influence of cervical balloon fluid volume on maternal labor process, maternal and infant outcomes, and pregnancy-related anxiety.
Trial report in World journal of psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe full implementation of the national two-child policy has presented significant challenges in ensuring the safety of pregnant women.
aimTo investigate the effect of cervical balloon fluid volume on maternal processes, maternal and infant outcomes, and anxiety during pregnancy.
methodsA total of 100 singleton term pregnancies with cervical maturity induction and anxiety were selected using a lottery method; 50 women were included. Cervical balloons were used for all participants. In the control group, 80 mL of fluid was injected into both balloons; in the observation group, 80 and 100 mL were injected into the vaginal and cervical balloons, respectively. The two groups were compared for cervical maturity, labor duration, anxiety, maternal and infant outcomes, and effects on cervical ripening.
resultsAfter treatment, the cervical maturity test (Bishop) score was significantly higher in the observation group (9.76 ± 1.19) than in the control group (7.62 ± 0.83), and the Hamilton Anxiety Scale score was lower in the observation group (7.32 ± 0.85) than in the control group (13.05 ± 1.12). The observation group showed higher rates of natural delivery and lower rates of cesarean section than the control group. The first and total stages of labor were shorter in the observation than in the control group; no significant differences were found in the second and third stages. The incidence of complications was lower in the observation group [1 (2.00%)
conclusionThe selected fluid volumes to promote cervical maturity and induce labor stabilize maternal mood, increase the natural delivery rate, shorten labor, and improve maternal and infant outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.