Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40309529›Full record

ReviewNigerian medical journal : journal of the Nigeria Medical Association

Association of Gut-Microbiome and mental health and effects of probiotics on psychiatric disorders: A Meta-analysis and systematic review.

Ramita Goel, Bhupesh Gupta, Vimal Naranbhai Satodiya, Ashok Ukabhai Vala, Hetal Dabhi, Anshu Mittal

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nigerian medical journal : journal of the Nigeria Medical Association. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ramita GoelMMIMSR (Maharishi Markandeshwar Institute of Medical Science and Research), Mullana, Haryana, India.
Bhupesh GuptaMMIMSR (Maharishi Markandeshwar Institute of Medical Science and Research), Mullana, Haryana, India.
Vimal Naranbhai SatodiyaInland Psychiatric Medical Group, Lancaster, California, United States of America.
Ashok Ukabhai ValaGovernment Medical College, Bhavnagar, Gujarat, India.
Hetal DabhiGovernment Medical College, Bhavnagar, Gujarat, India.
Anshu MittalMMIMSR (Maharishi Markandeshwar Institute of Medical Science and Research), Mullana, Haryana, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: A correlation between gut microbiome and mental health has drawn significant attention lately. The effects of microbiome microorganisms and their byproducts on disease states represent a complex and dynamic field of study. The objective of this article is to review the association of gut microbes and mental health and the effects of probiotics on psychiatric disorders, if any. Methodology: This meta-analysis was conducted using the PRISMA standards. We have compiled the most recent advancements in the field according to human research published in this Systematic review and meta-analysis. Results: The forest plot analysis revealed that probiotics or probiotics combined with other intervention modalities did significantly reduce some extent of mental disorders in comparison to the control group (Standardized mean difference) SMD = 0.95, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): -6.52 to 8.42, P value< 0.01. Conclusion: Overall, the reviewed literature supports the importance of gut microbiota-brain interaction in human mental illnesses, including the impact of probiotics on mental health outcomes and brain connection.

Indexed as

AnxietyBacteriaDepressionGut-microbiomeMental Health

Identifiers

PMID40309529
PMCPMC12038616

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.