ReviewFrontiers in psychiatry2025
A bibliometric study for global hotspots and trends in animal-assisted interventions (1983-2023).
Review in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A bibliometric and visualization analysis for global research trends in Wushu and mental health (1981-2024).Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Pooled it
- Preparing Therapy Dogs for Animal-Assisted Services: Governance, Welfare-Centred Preparation, and a Lifecycle Research Agenda Across Selected European and United States Frameworks.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Review
- Bibliometric analysis of global research on liquid biopsy for gastric cancer.Discover oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: As a therapeutic approach, Animal-Assisted Intervention (AAI) has gained increasing recognition for enhancing both psychological and physical health. However, bibliometric studies in this field remain scarce. Methods: This study aims to analyze AAI-related research from 1983 to 2023 using bibliometric methods. It examines sources of literature, core journals, highly cited documents, country and institutional distribution, prolific authors, and high-frequency keywords while tracking the evolution of research themes in AAI. A thematic search using the Boolean operator "OR" and AAI-related keywords in the Web of Science database yielded 405 articles, and data mining and visualization of these results were performed. Results: The findings reveal a substantial increase in the number of published articles and citations over the past decade, indicating a rising research interest in this field. The United States and Purdue University have played a leading role in this area. Currently, AAI research is shifting from basic studies to intervention strategies targeting specific populations and diseases. Future research trends may include enhanced international collaboration, standardization of research methods, and the development of more targeted interventions. Conclusion: These findings provide researchers, funding agencies, and policymakers with scientific insights and recommendations for future research directions in AAI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.