Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40309498›Full record

ArticleJAC-antimicrobial resistance2025

Significant reduction in antibiotic prescription rates in Japan following implementation of the national action plan on antimicrobial resistance (2016-20): a 9-year interrupted time-series analysis.

Hideki Hashimoto, Naoki Kanda, Hiromasa Yoshimoto, Kazuo Goda, Naohiro Mitsutake, Shuji Hatakeyama

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAC-antimicrobial resistance, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Reporting macrolide-resistantJournal of clinical microbiology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Practical and clinical significance of the pharmacist-led antimicrobial stewardship.Journal of pharmaceutical health care and sciences · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hideki HashimotoDivision of General Internal Medicine, Jichi Medical University Hospital, 3311-1 Yakushiji, Shimotsuke-shi, Tochigi 329-0498, Japan.
Naoki KandaDivision of General Internal Medicine, Jichi Medical University Hospital, 3311-1 Yakushiji, Shimotsuke-shi, Tochigi 329-0498, Japan.
Hiromasa YoshimotoDepartment of Research, Institute for Health Economics and Policy, 1-5-11, Nishi-Shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo 105-0003, Japan.
Kazuo GodaInstitute of Industrial Science, The University of Tokyo, 4-6-1 Komaba, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 153-8505, Japan.
Naohiro MitsutakeDepartment of Research, Institute for Health Economics and Policy, 1-5-11, Nishi-Shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo 105-0003, Japan.
Shuji HatakeyamaDivision of General Internal Medicine, Jichi Medical University Hospital, 3311-1 Yakushiji, Shimotsuke-shi, Tochigi 329-0498, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Research on the effectiveness of Japan's national action plan on antimicrobial resistance, including among individuals with HIV, remains scarce. Objectives: To evaluate the impact of policies on antibiotic prescription practices. Methods: Outpatient oral antibiotic prescription data from 2012 to 2020 were extracted from a national claims database comprising >98% of the Japanese population. Prescription rates were stratified according to antibiotic class, diagnosis and HIV status. An interrupted time-series analysis was performed to assess the impact of the national action plan. Results: An average of 129,989,400 prescriptions were issued annually (1024 per 1000 population-years). Between 2012 and 2020, the oral antibiotic prescription rate decreased by 54%. The prescription rate showed a significant downward trend post-intervention (additional annual reduction in incidence rate ratio, 0.889; 95% confidence interval, 0.889-0.990). However, broad-spectrum antibiotics (third-generation cephalosporins, macrolides and fluoroquinolones) remained prevalent, comprising 84.7% and 71.4% of prescriptions in 2012 and 2020, respectively. Antibiotic prescriptions during outpatient visits for pharyngitis, sinusitis, bronchitis and viral upper respiratory infections decreased significantly (rate ratios = 0.66, 0.76, 0.51 and 0.49, respectively). The antibiotic prescription rate was ∼2.5-fold higher in individuals with HIV than in those without. Conclusions: Antibiotic prescription rates significantly decreased following the implementation of the national action plan. However, a sharp decline in 2020, likely due to the coronavirus disease pandemic, requires continued rebound monitoring. Reducing broad-spectrum oral antibiotic overuse remains a critical focus.

Identifiers

PMID40309498
PMCPMC12041918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.