ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2025
Female Genital Schistosomiasis (FGS) in a Nonendemic Setting: Retrospective Case-Notes Review of
Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- From clinical research to public health action: addressing chronic female genital schistosomiasis in non-endemic countries.Parasitology · 2025Article
- Genital schistosomiasis in non-endemic settings: a clinical perspective.Parasitology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Female genital schistosomiasis (FGS), the genital manifestation of Methods: A retrospective case-notes review was undertaken of patients presenting to the Hospital for Tropical Diseases, London, from 1998 to 2018 with Results: Overall, 186 patients with Conclusions: Given that 75% of women with
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.