ArticleVideo journal of sports medicine
Arthroscopic Repair of the Bankart Lesion Using Dual-Row Labral Repair.
Article in Video journal of sports medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The most common technique described for bankart repair is the single-row labral repair. Recent interest has been the use of a dual-row, double pulley technique, first described by Zhang et al and popularized by Millett et al as the "bony Bankart bridge" technique. The aim of this study is to report a double-row all-suture labral fixation technique using knotless anchors. Technique: Step 1: glenohumeral debridement, and preparation of the glenoid labral and Bankart. The patient is first placed in the beach-chair position and surface landmarks are created. The standard posterior portal is first created and the glenohumeral joint is evaluated. Once the lesion is identified, the relevant working anterosuperior and anteroinferior portals are established using the outside-in technique. The synovitis is debrided to allow visualization and the labrum is liberated from the anterior glenoid. The Bankart lesion fragment is liberated, and partial fragments are osteotomized. With the anterolateral portal as the viewing portal, the anterior rim of the glenoid is now decorticated using a motorized shaver and rasp to create a bleeding bony surface. Step 2: the low rim anchor (5:30 o'clock). At the anterior-inferior aspect of the glenoid, the drill guide is positioned as low as possible (5:30 o'clock position for the right shoulder) and about 7 to 10 mm medial to the rim of the glenoid. The first 1.8 mm single-loaded suture anchor (Q-FIX All-Suture Anchor) is then inserted via the posterior portal. Step 3: the anterior-inferior-medial (AIM) anchor (4 o'clock). Step 4: the knotless high rim anchor (3 o'clock). Step 5: tying of sutures. The sutures from each anchor are tied in a mattress configuration, eventually creating a suture bridge over the labral repair. Discussion/Conclusion: This dual row labral repair technique allows for maximum compression and contact between the fragment and the glenoid bed, allowing healing over a contact area rather than just the rim. The other added advantage is the use of curved tip anchors which allow negotiation of difficult corners, especially in the 5 to 6 o'clock position.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.