ArticleFrontiers in digital health2025
Deep conditional generative model for personalization of 12-lead electrocardiograms and cardiovascular risk prediction.
Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cardiovascular Genetic Epidemiology in the Genome-Wide Era: From Association Discovery to Mechanistic Dissection and Clinical Translation.Cardiovascular drugs and therapy · 2026Review
- Evaluating Homoscedastic Uncertainty Weighting and Generative Tau Imputation in a Multimodal, Multitask Deep Learning Framework for Alzheimer's Disease.Neuroinformatics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: 12-lead electrocardiograms (ECGs) are a cornerstone for diagnosing and monitoring cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). They play a key role in detecting abnormalities such as arrhythmias and myocardial infarction, enabling early intervention and risk stratification. However, traditional analysis relies heavily on manual interpretation, which is time-consuming and expertise-dependent. Moreover, existing machine learning models often lack personalization, as they fail to integrate subject-specific anatomical and demographic information. Advances in deep generative models offer an opportunity to overcome these challenges by synthesizing personalized ECGs and extracting clinically relevant features for improved risk assessment. Methods: We propose a conditional Variational Autoencoder (cVAE) framework to generate realistic, subject-specific 12-lead ECGs by incorporating demographic metadata, anatomical heart features, and ECG electrodes' positions as conditioning factors. This allows for physiologically consistent and personalized ECG synthesis. Furthermore, we introduce a revised Cox proportional-hazards regression model that utilizes the latent embeddings learned by the cVAE to predict future CVD risk. This approach not only enhances the interpretability of ECG-derived risk factors but also demonstrates the potential of deep generative models in personalized cardiac assessment. Results: Our model is trained and validated on the UK Biobank dataset and Conclusion: This work marks a significant advancement in ECG analysis by providing a conditional VAE framework that not only improves ECG generation but also enriches our understanding of the relationship between ECG patterns and subject-specific information. Importantly, our approach enables clinically significant information to be extracted from 12-lead ECGs, providing valuable insights for predicting future CVD risks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.