ArticleJournal of biomedical optics2025
Article in Journal of biomedical optics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Re: Dao et al.,Journal of biomedical optics · 2026Article
- Re: Tyagi comments on "Journal of biomedical optics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Significance: We provide the first direct evidence of the urothelial response to water transport through the urothelium, traditionally considered impermeable. Using optical coherence tomography (OCT), we observe that the urothelium absorbs and expels water under varying concentrations of NaCl, challenging long-held views about its impermeability. The discovery that osmotic stress can induce urothelial damage has implications for bladder disorders such as interstitial cystitis and overactive bladder, where urothelial integrity is compromised. Aim: Traditionally considered impermeable, the urothelium has recently been implicated in water transport due to the presence of aquaporins. Despite this, direct evidence of the urothelial response to water movement through the urothelium remains elusive. We aim to provide such evidence by examining urothelial responses to NaCl solutions using OCT. Approach: Fresh porcine bladder samples were subjected to OCT imaging to observe urothelial responses under varying osmolarity conditions, using NaCl solutions ranging from 0.31 to Results: OCT imaging revealed a significant increase in urothelial optical pathlength thickness following deionized water application, indicative of water absorption. Conversely, exposure to higher osmolarity NaCl solutions resulted in urothelial shrinkage, suggesting water efflux. Histological analysis demonstrated intact cellular structures at lower osmolarities ( Conclusions: We provide evidence that the urothelium is a dynamic barrier capable of water transport, influenced by osmotic gradients. The observed osmotic-induced urothelial damage may have important implications for the pathophysiology of conditions such as interstitial cystitis and overactive bladder, offering insights into potential diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. These findings warrant further investigation using human tissue.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.