ArticleVideo journal of sports medicine
Anatomic Multiple Ligament Reconstructions of the Knee.
Article in Video journal of sports medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Multiple ligament injuries of the knee occur in a variety of settings, often from athletic activities. Multiple cruciate and collateral ligament injuries may be associated with hamstring tendon rupture, common peroneal nerve (CPN) injury, meniscus, bone, and cartilage damage. Indications: After evaluation for concomitant life-threatening and vascular injuries (especially of the popliteal artery), the knee is assessed through a thorough physical examination and imaging series, including varus, valgus, and posterior stress radiography, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Research over the last 30 years has suggested that operative treatment in the acute setting (<3 weeks) in a single-stage procedure may have improved results to delayed/staged reconstruction. Early range of motion starting on postoperative day 1 is important to prevent development of arthrofibrosis. Technique: We describe the technique used to surgically manage a patient suffering from anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), posterior cruciate ligament (PCL), and complete posterolateral corner (PLC) rupture. Neurolysis of the CPN is performed to free the irritated nerve from scar tissue, along with biceps femoris tendon and lateral capsular repairs. Anatomic-based reconstructions are performed. The ACL reconstruction is with a single bundle using a patellar tendon autograft, PCL reconstruction is a double bundle with Achilles and tibialis anterior tendon allografts, and PLC reconstruction is accomplished with a split Achilles tendon allograft. The correct orientation of tunnel placement must be planned to avoid tunnel convergence; these angles have been determined through 3D modeling. The optimal sequence for graft tensioning has been established and follows the pattern: PCL, ACL, PLC, and then medial-sided structures if necessary. Results: Successful outcomes have been reported for both medial and lateral based injuries, and follow-up studies have also shown equivalent results between acute and chronic outcomes, and for multiligament injuries involving the ACL and PCL if anatomic reconstructions with appropriate tunnel angles, passage and tensioning sequence of grafts, and rehabilitation regimens are performed. Discussion/Conclusion: Single-stage anatomic reconstruction is the gold standard for managing multiple ligament injuries in the knee. Commencement of early 0° to 90° knee range of motion and PCL-supporting bracing are critical to prevent arthrofibrosis and protect the grafts from attenuation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.