ArticleEuropean cardiology2025
Factor XI and Atrial Fibrillation: A Mismatched Pairing?
Article in European cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The OCEANIC trial journey: from failure to breakthrough?European heart journal. Cardiovascular pharmacotherapy · 2026Article
- Factor XI Inhibitors in Atrial Fibrillation: Insights and Implications from Recent Trials.Advances in therapy · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Factor XI (FXI) is a liver-produced coagulation zymogen that evolutionarily originated from duplication of the gene encoding for prekallikrein. It circulates in complex with high-molecular-weight kininogen, and consists of two identical subunits that bind thrombin, FXIIa and FIX. Thus, the FXI molecule has features different from other coagulation factors. Pharmacological FXI blockade using small molecules, monoclonal antibodies and antisense oligonucleotides, has been developed, with a hypothesis of a bleeding-free, effective anticoagulation. Dose-finding Phase II trials were performed for thromboprophylaxis in orthopaedic surgery, non-valvular AF and as an add-on strategy to antiplatelet drugs in acute atherothrombosis (stroke or MI). None of those studies were powered for safety or efficacy, but rather, they were used to select the optimal dose for Phase III studies. Nevertheless, their limited results were often (over)interpreted as supporting the hypothesis of the first bleeding-free anticoagulation strategy. The failure of the Phase III OCEANIC-AF trial comparing the FXI inhibitor asundexian to the FXa inhibitor apixaban in AF obliged the scientific community to reconsider the bleeding-free hypothesis and the pathophysiology of FXI. Here, the molecular, disease-related and pharmacological features of FXI were analysed to provide possible explanation(s) and hypotheses for this (temporary) failure of FXI targeting. Specifically, the authors describe the peculiar features of the molecule in the coagulation cascade, the possible mechanisms for the bypassing of FXI activity, the clinical evidence related to FXI congenital deficiency, levels measured in pro-thrombotic settings, the pathophysiology of different thromboembolic disorders and the pharmacodynamics of FXI blockade in Phase I and II studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.