Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40309188›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2025

Three-dimensional fossils of a Cretaceous collared carpet shark (Parascylliidae, Orectolobiformes) shed light on skeletal evolution in galeomorphs.

Richard P Dearden, Zerina Johanson, Helen L O'Neill, Kieran Miles, Emma L Bernard, Brett Clark, Charlie J Underwood, Martin Rücklin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Richard P DeardenVertebrate Evolution, Development, and Ecology, Naturalis Biodiversity Center, Leiden 2333 CR, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3522-7304
Zerina JohansonNatural History Museum, London, SW7 5BD, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8444-6776
Helen L O'NeillCSIRO Australian National Fish Collection, National Research Collections Australia, Hobart, Tasmania TAS 7001, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7096-687X
Kieran MilesNatural History Museum, London, SW7 5BD, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-5294-1132
Emma L BernardNatural History Museum, London, SW7 5BD, UK.
Brett ClarkNatural History Museum, London, SW7 5BD, UK.
Charlie J UnderwoodSchool of Natural Sciences, Birkbeck College, London WC1E 7HX, UK.
Martin RücklinVertebrate Evolution, Development, and Ecology, Naturalis Biodiversity Center, Leiden 2333 CR, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7254-837X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A rich fossil record of teeth shows that many living shark families' origins lie deep in the Mesozoic. Skeletal fossils of the sharks to whom these teeth belonged are far rarer and when they are preserved are often flattened, hindering understanding of the evolutionary radiation of living shark groups. Here we use computed tomography to describe two articulated Upper Cretaceous shark skeletons from the Chalk of the UK preserving three-dimensional neurocrania, visceral cartilages, pectoral skeletons and vertebrae. These fossils display skeletal anatomies characteristic of the Parascylliidae, a family of Orectolobiformes now endemic to Australia and the Indo Pacific. However, they differ in having a more heavily mineralized braincase and a tri-basal pectoral fin endoskeleton, while their teeth can be attributed to a new species of the problematic taxon

Indexed as

CretaceousCT scanningElasmobranchiiGaleomorphiiOrectolobiformes

Identifiers

PMID40309188
PMCPMC12040461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.