ArticleNeurotrauma reports2025
Feasibility and Acceptability of Telephone-Administered Traumatic Brain Injury Common Data Elements and the Rehabilitation Needs Survey in Community-Dwelling Adults Exposed to the United States Criminal Legal System.
Article in Neurotrauma reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is common among legally-impacted adults and has also been linked to negative outcomes throughout the criminal legal system. Despite this, relatively limited TBI research has focused on or even included legally-impacted adults. Existing literature in this population has used heterogeneous TBI definitions, populations, and measures when studying outcomes. This study therefore investigates the feasibility and acceptability of telephone-administered TBI common data elements (CDEs) and the Rehabilitation Needs Survey (RNS) in 85 legally-impacted community-dwelling adults. Regarding feasibility, completion rates across measures were high (88-100%), and noncompletion was most commonly due to participants declining to continue. Regarding acceptability, data collectors were able to administer and code most measures with relative ease. Reported difficulties related to measures requiring detailed data collector training to administer and code, such as the Brain Injury Screening Questionnaire (BISQ) and Brief Test of Adult Cognition by Telephone, or challenges inherent to self-report tests in general. In addition, data collectors recommended adding specific questions to the BISQ to query head injuries experienced during or as a result of their exposure to the criminal legal system. Overall, results support the use of telephone-administered TBI CDEs and the RNS in legally-impacted adults, and underscore the need for culturally-responsive training and technical assistance for TBI researchers engaging with this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.