Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40309111›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2025

Island ancient genomes reveal dynamic populations interactions in the northern China.

Xu Zhang, Fan Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Xu ZhangKey Laboratory of Archaeological Sciences and Cultural Heritage, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, Beijing, China.
Fan ZhangSchool of Archaeology and Museology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Longshan period (2500-1900 BC) was a transformative era in central China, marked by the emergence of complex social structures and early state formation. While human mobility likely played a role in these developments, the scale and nature of migration during this period remain poorly understood. Previous ancient DNA studies on Longshan culture populations have focused on individuals from inland Shandong, with no ancient DNA data available from island populations. In this study, we present the first ancient DNA analysis from individuals associated with the Longshan and subsequent Yueshi cultures on the Tuoji Island. Our findings indicate that, despite the widespread cultural influence of the inland Longshan culture in Shandong, the genetic ancestry of the Tuoji Island individuals primarily reflects connections to the preceding Dawenkou culture, with additional ancestry linked to the coastal regions of southern China. This suggests an earlier population movement into Tuoji Island before the Longshan period. However, during the Longshan period, the spread of Longshan cultural materials on Tuoji Island appears to represent the diffusion of ideas rather than significant population admixture from the inland. Additionally, our study shows genetic continuity of Longshan and Yueshi cultures in Tuoji Island highlighting the dynamic nature of coastal migration, as the Tuoji Island populations exhibit more genetic influence from coastal regions than from the inland. In contrast, inland populations during the Longshan period show no significant genetic influx from neighboring regions. This study not only advances our understanding of the prehistoric populations in Neolithic China but also provides new insights into patterns of migration and cultural exchange during this critical period.

Indexed as

ancient DNADakou siteLiaodong PeninsulaMiaodao ArchipelagoTuoji Island

Identifiers

PMID40309111
PMCPMC12040904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.