Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40309101›Full record

ArticleVideo journal of sports medicine

Hybrid Repair of a Medial Meniscus Mid-Body Radial Tear.

Carlos E Franciozi, Enzo S Mameri, Felipe C Schumacher, Marcos V Credidio, Marcelo S Kubota, Marcus V Luzo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Video journal of sports medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Carlos E FrancioziDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Enzo S MameriDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9642-4868
Felipe C SchumacherDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Marcos V CredidioDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Marcelo S KubotaDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Marcus V LuzoDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Meniscal radial tears are associated with altered contact mechanics, as they have the potential to disrupt the meniscal hoop stress mechanism. In prior studies, radial tears are associated with higher grade of cartilage damage, as well as higher rate and severity of meniscal extrusion in knees with a radial tear relative to other types of tears. Improved understanding of the meniscus biological potential together with modern developments in surgical technique has paved the way for the current emphasis on repairing even radial tears. Indication: Large or complete radial tears of the meniscus without prohibitive joint space narrowing or severe cartilage damage. Technique Description: A hybrid technique of meniscal radial repair is described, combining (1) 2 transtibial pullout cinch-loop sutures, (2) 2 inside-out vertical rip-stop sutures and 2 oblique sutures in a "cross-tag" configuration, and (3) 1 horizontal mattress all-inside suture. The repair is biologically augmented with a notch marrow-venting procedure. Results: Recent evidence has demonstrated significant biomechanical benefit in terms of increased load to failure and construct strength when adding transtibial tunnel augmentation to radial repairs. In addition, rip-stop sutures decrease the chance of cut-out relative to nonreinforced repairs. Those biomechanical advancements are reflected in excellent patient-reported outcomes as well as healing rates following radial repair. Discussion/Conclusion: We present a hybrid technique encompassing the most biomechanically effective novel radial repair techniques, backed by excellent clinical outcomes following radial repair in the current literature. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.

Indexed as

all-inside meniscus repairkneemeniscusmeniscus radial repairmeniscus radial tear

Identifiers

PMID40309101
PMCPMC11966207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.