ArticleEndoscopy international open2025
Effect of gastroenterology resident use of a social network workgroup on skills in characterizing colorectal neoplasia: Prospective study.
Article in Endoscopy international open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and study aims: Accurate endoscopic characterization of colorectal lesions is essential for predicting histology but remains difficult. We studied the impact of a social network workgroup on level of characterization of colorectal lesions by gastroenterology residents. Methods: We prospectively involved residents who characterized 25 and 40 colorectal lesions in two different questionnaires over 1 year. Three groups were considered: regulars who were already part of the workgroup before the first evaluation, newcomers who joined in during evaluation, and reluctant who did not. Participants rated each lesion according to the CONECCT classification (hyperplastic polyp [IH], sessile serrated lesion [IS], adenoma [IIA], high-risk adenoma or superficial adenocarcinoma [IIC], borderline invasive adenocarcinoma [IIC+], or deeply invasive adenocarcinoma [III]) and their progression score over 1 year was assessed. Correct histological status was defined by pathology reports or combined criteria between histology and expert opinion for high-risk adenoma or adenocarcinoma. Results: Of the 117 participants, 82.9% completed the two questionnaires, with 16.5% regulars, 71.1% newcomers, and 12.4% reluctant. For similar starting levels, progression in characterization was +2 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1-3; Conclusions: Gastroenterology resident 1-year use of a social network workgroup does not improve their skills in characterizing colorectal neoplasia. Further intensive training is needed to improve the characterization level of gastroenterology residents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.