Trial reportFrontiers in public health2025
Shaping a positive occupational safety climate in general practice teams-findings of the baseline survey of the cluster randomized IMPROVE
Trial report in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Perceived health, musculoskeletal disorders, work conditions and safety climate in relation to patient handling and movement - a multicentre cross-sectional study at healthcare workplaces.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Trial
- Investigating Factors Associated with Employees' Attitudes Towards Work-Related Infection Control Measures During the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Exploratory Cross-Sectional Study from Seven Different Companies in Germany, July-August 2021.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The consideration of occupational health and safety can support the creation of good sustainable working conditions in general practices and help in retaining staff and support their workability. This study aimed to assess attitudes of primary care physicians and practice assistants toward occupational safety climate, and to identify what factors are associated with a perceived positive occupational safety climate in this setting. The identification of such factors in general practice settings can serve as a basis for further developments of specific tailored interventions and offers to promote workplace safety for GPs and practice assistants. Methods: This study is based on baseline data of a cluster randomized controlled trial (IMPROVE Results: We found a positive perception of occupational safety climate across all occupational groups, for example regarding the role of the direct supervisor in occupational safety at work or the occupational safety commitment of the practice. Bivariate analysis mainly revealed associations between occupational safety climate and several aspects of working conditions. The regression model revealed the following important factors for perceived positive occupational safety climate (assessed by the scale company standards): supervisor support for occupational safety (β = 0.43) and job satisfaction (β = 0.22). Discussion: Leadership and job satisfaction were identified as main factors shaping a positive occupational safety climate (scale company standards) in our regression model built on data from German general practices and their practice teams. The findings are consistent with a previous study conducted in the German healthcare setting. The promotion of these factors should be supported further and can probably contribute to improving the occupational safety climate in general practices in Germany.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.