Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40308925›Full record

Trial reportFrontiers in public health2025

Shaping a positive occupational safety climate in general practice teams-findings of the baseline survey of the cluster randomized IMPROVE

Anke Wagner, Esther Rind, Stephanie Burgess, Irina Böckelmann, Beatrice Thielmann, Helen Heinz, Achim Siegel, Verena Schröder, Karl-Heinz Jöckel, Anika Hüsing and 9 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Anke WagnerInstitute of Occupational and Social Medicine and Health Services Research, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Esther RindInstitute of Occupational and Social Medicine and Health Services Research, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Stephanie BurgessInstitute of Occupational and Social Medicine and Health Services Research, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Irina BöckelmannFaculty of Medicine, Institute of Occupational Medicine, Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
Beatrice ThielmannInstitute of Occupational and Social Medicine and Health Services Research, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Helen HeinzCenter for Clinical Trials, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Achim SiegelInstitute of Occupational and Social Medicine and Health Services Research, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Verena SchröderCenter for Clinical Trials, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Karl-Heinz JöckelCenter for Clinical Trials, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Anika HüsingCenter for Clinical Trials, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Claudia PieperInstitute for Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Anna-Lisa EilertsInstitute for Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Tanja Seifried-DübonDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Florian JunneDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Brigitte WernersOperations Research, Institute of Management, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Annegret DreherInstitute of General Practice and Family Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Lukas DegenInstitute of General Practice and Family Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Birgitta M WeltermannInstitute of General Practice and Family Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Monika A RiegerInstitute of Occupational and Social Medicine and Health Services Research, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The consideration of occupational health and safety can support the creation of good sustainable working conditions in general practices and help in retaining staff and support their workability. This study aimed to assess attitudes of primary care physicians and practice assistants toward occupational safety climate, and to identify what factors are associated with a perceived positive occupational safety climate in this setting. The identification of such factors in general practice settings can serve as a basis for further developments of specific tailored interventions and offers to promote workplace safety for GPs and practice assistants. Methods: This study is based on baseline data of a cluster randomized controlled trial (IMPROVE Results: We found a positive perception of occupational safety climate across all occupational groups, for example regarding the role of the direct supervisor in occupational safety at work or the occupational safety commitment of the practice. Bivariate analysis mainly revealed associations between occupational safety climate and several aspects of working conditions. The regression model revealed the following important factors for perceived positive occupational safety climate (assessed by the scale company standards): supervisor support for occupational safety (β = 0.43) and job satisfaction (β = 0.22). Discussion: Leadership and job satisfaction were identified as main factors shaping a positive occupational safety climate (scale company standards) in our regression model built on data from German general practices and their practice teams. The findings are consistent with a previous study conducted in the German healthcare setting. The promotion of these factors should be supported further and can probably contribute to improving the occupational safety climate in general practices in Germany.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelGeneral PracticeOccupational HealthOrganizational CultureWorkplaceAdultFemaleGermanyHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and Questionnairesgeneral practiceGermanyoccupational healthoccupational safety climatephysiciansprimary careregression analysisworking conditions

Identifiers

PMID40308925
PMCPMC12041036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.