Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40308867›Full record

ReviewAEM education and training2025

Bridging the gap: Leveraging simulation expertise to improve active learning environments.

Michelle D Hughes, Tina H Chen, Jessica C Schoen, Michael A Lamberta, Michael Cassara, Sara M Hock, Lars K Beattie, Stephanie Stapleton, Hillary C Moss, Jeffrey R Heiferman and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in AEM education and training, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Michelle D HughesUniversity of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health Madison Wisconsin USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9209-0506
Tina H ChenSt. Louis University St. Louis Missouri USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6641-2687
Jessica C SchoenMayo Clinic Health System Austin Minnesota USA.
Michael A LambertaMaimonides Medical Center Brooklyn New York City USA.
Michael CassaraNorthwell New Hyde Park New York USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6483-4838
Sara M HockRush University Medical College Chicago Illinois USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7495-2272
Lars K BeattieUniversity of Florida Gainesville Florida USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1287-5598
Stephanie StapletonBoston University/Boston Medical Center Boston Massachusetts USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1593-1943
Hillary C MossMontefiore Medical Center Einstein College of Medicine Bronx New York USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-3293-7053
Jeffrey R HeifermanLoyola University Medical Center Maywood Illinois USA.
Julie C RiceJohns Hopkins School of Medicine Baltimore Maryland USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1555-655X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Active learning engages learners in constructing knowledge through interactive strategies such as simulation, small-group discussion, and peer instruction. Although recognized as a superior approach to traditional passive learning, its adoption has been inconsistent. Barriers include reliance on traditional lectures, lack of training, and limited time to develop materials. Simulation educators have a unique skill set that may inform and support active learning initiatives. Methods: Fifteen emergency medicine simulation experts convened to define the unique skill set of simulation educators and identify transferable simulation-based medical education (SBME) skills and concepts to promote effective active learning beyond the simulation lab. Workgroup members are simulation education directors who have undergone specialized training in SBME. During biweekly meetings over 6 months, workgroup members reviewed primary literature in SBME and active learning, along with relevant simulation educator training materials. Objectives were achieved through iterative review, group conceptualization, and expert consensus. Unique treatment: The increasing prevalence of SBME in medical education, along with the growth of simulation fellowships, has produced a group of education experts with shared competencies. Simulation educators acquire expertise in psychological safety, facilitation, communication, and debriefing, through specialized training and extensive experience. These skills are critical for active learning environments where learners benefit from structured, engaging, and psychologically safe experiences. Implications for educators: Key transferable SBME topics were identified for use in active learning environments outside of the simulation lab: (1) psychological safety, (2) facilitation strategies, and (3) communication techniques. Transferable tools and concepts were identified to promote efficacy and learner engagement during active learning in diverse environments. Simulation educators' expertise is an underutilized resource for faculty development initiatives aimed at advancing active learning. This work advocates for leveraging simulation educators' skills to close the active learning implementation gap, enhance learner outcomes, and meet the evolving needs of contemporary medical education.

Indexed as

active learningcurriculum developmentemergency medicinefaculty developmentmedical educationsimulation‐based medical education

Identifiers

PMID40308867
PMCPMC12038856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.