Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40308842›Full record

ArticleVideo journal of sports medicine

The Triple Varus Knee: A Case Presentation.

Camila Grandberg, Janina Kaarre, Laura E Keeling, Bálint Zsidai, Justin J Greiner, Volker Musahl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Video journal of sports medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Camila GrandbergDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, UPMC Freddie Fu Sports Medicine Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2220-9780
Janina KaarreDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, UPMC Freddie Fu Sports Medicine Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Laura E KeelingDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, UPMC Freddie Fu Sports Medicine Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7776-6635
Bálint ZsidaiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, UPMC Freddie Fu Sports Medicine Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5697-6577
Justin J GreinerDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, UPMC Freddie Fu Sports Medicine Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6189-6101
Volker MusahlDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, UPMC Freddie Fu Sports Medicine Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Knee instability due to posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) and posterolateral corner (PLC) deficiency is a devastating condition that negatively affects patient quality of life. This video presents the surgical management of a triple varus knee, including combined high tibial osteotomy (HTO), revision PCL and PLC reconstruction, and meniscus root repair. Indications: Combined HTO and revision PCL and PLC reconstruction is indicated for patients with previously failed PCL and PLC reconstruction in the setting of varus malalignment. Technique Description: The procedure begins with a medial opening-wedge biplanar HTO, which is fixed with a patient-specific locking plate. The PCL femoral tunnel is drilled via a low anterolateral portal, and the tibial insertion is debrided via a posteromedial portal. The medial meniscus is carefully freed from the posterior capsule, and 2 luggage tag sutures are placed through the posterior root. The PCL tibial tunnel and meniscus root tunnels are drilled via their respective guides. The meniscal sutures are passed through the tunnel but not fixed. An Achilles bone-block allograft is passed through the PCL tibial tunnel and fixed with suspensory fixation and an interference screw on the femoral side, while the tibial side is left free. A peroneal nerve neurolysis is performed. A fibular tunnel is drilled, and a semitendinosus allograft is whip-stitched on both sides and passed through the tunnel. A Beath pin is inserted into the femur, and the tunnel is over drilled. Both limbs of the graft are passed deep to the iliotibial band and into the tunnel. The tibial side of the PCL is fixed with an interference screw at 90° of knee flexion. The PLC grafts are fixed with an interference screw at 30° of knee flexion with slight valgus. The medial meniscus root sutures are tied over a button, with 60° of knee flexion. Screws from osteotomy fixation are replaced as needed. Results: Although outcomes following the combined procedure are lacking, good to excellent clinical outcomes have been reported in isolation following each procedure. Conclusion: A combination of HTO and revision PCL and PLC reconstruction should be considered for patients with persistent instability and/or pain in the setting of triple varus knee. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.

Indexed as

medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomymeniscus root repairrevision posterior cruciate ligament reconstructionrevision posterolateral corner reconstruction

Identifiers

PMID40308842
PMCPMC11969496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.