ArticleVideo journal of sports medicine
Arthroscopic Remplissage for Anterior Shoulder Instability.
Article in Video journal of sports medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: There are several approaches such as the Bankart repair, Latarjet, and Remplissage to treat recurrent glenohumeral instability. Indications: We chose to augment an arthroscopic Bankart repair with a Remplissage in this 26-year-old patient given the presence of a Hill-Sachs lesion, history of recurrent shoulder dislocations, and young age of the patient. Technique Description: We established four portals using previously well-documented techniques. The Hill-Sachs lesion was evaluated using the anterosuperior portal. Two anchors were placed, one on both the superior and inferior aspects of the Hill-Sachs lesion. The sutures were shuttled through the knotless anchor mechanism and tensioned after confirming the cannula was through the deltoid. Then, we completed the Remplissage by repairing the infraspinatus tendon and capsule into the posterior humeral head. Results: The Remplissage procedure is very successful at reducing recurrent instability in young, active patients. Previous studies have reported very low rates, even 0% recurrent instability, after surgery with 80% to 90% of patients returning to sports. Studies have also documented excellent patient-reported outcomes at short- to mid-term follow-up. Complication rates are historically lower when the Remplissage is done with an arthroscopic Bankart repair than the Bankart repair alone. Discussion/Conclusion: The Remplissage procedure is a safe, effective option at reducing future instances of shoulder dislocations in conjunction with Bankart repairs. Patients can expect to return to their active lifestyles, with many patients achieving the same level of activity as before the initial shoulder dislocation. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.