Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40308811›Full record

ArticleDigital health

Patient-facing chatbots: Enhancing healthcare accessibility while navigating digital literacy challenges and isolation risks-a mixed-methods study.

Annie A Moore, Jessica R Ellis, Natalia Dellavalle, Marlee Akerson, Matt Andazola, Eric G Campbell, Matthew DeCamp

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. What patients want from healthcare chatbots: insights from a mixed-methods study.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Annie A MooreDepartment of Medicine, General Internal Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1079-9464
Jessica R EllisCenter for Bioethics and Humanities, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.
Natalia DellavalleCenter for Bioethics and Humanities, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.
Marlee AkersonCenter for Bioethics and Humanities, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.
Matt AndazolaUniversity of Colorado Health System, Aurora, CO, USA.
Eric G CampbellCenter for Bioethics and Humanities, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.
Matthew DeCampDepartment of Medicine, General Internal Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Digital communication between patients and healthcare teams is increasing. Most patients find this effective, yet many patients remain digitally isolated, a social determinant of health. This study investigates patient attitudes toward healthcare's newest digital assistant, the chatbot, and perceptions regarding healthcare access. Methods: We conducted a mixed methods study among patient users of a large healthcare system's chatbot integrated within an electronic health record. We purposively oversampled by race and ethnicity to survey 617/3089 (response rate 20%) patient users online using de novo and validated items. In addition, we conducted semi-structured interviews with users (n = 46) purposively sampled based on diversity, age, or select survey responses between November 2022 and May 2024. Results: In surveys, 213/609 (35.0%) felt they could not understand the chatbot completely, and 376/614 (61.2%) felt the chatbot did not completely understand them. Of 238 users who felt completely understood by the chatbot, 178 (74.8%) believed the chatbot was intended to help them access healthcare; in comparison, of 376 users who felt not completely understood, 155 (41%) believed the chatbot was intended to help access ( Conclusion: Patients' experience with the chatbot appears to affect their perception of the intent of the chatbot's implementation; those adept at chatbot communication or within historically less trusting groups may prefer a quick, non-judgmental answer to questions via the chatbot rather than human interaction. Although our findings are limited to one health system's existing chatbot users, as patient-facing chatbots expand, attention to these factors can support healthcare systems' efforts to design chatbots that meet the unique communication needs of all patients, expressly those at risk of digital isolation.

Indexed as

digital isolationdigital literacyhealthcare accesspatient experiencePatient-facing chatbots

Identifiers

PMID40308811
PMCPMC12041682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.