ArticleActa medica Philippina2025
Article in Acta medica Philippina, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Phytofabrication of Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles UsingBioinorganic chemistry and applications · 2026Article
- Fingerroot Extract Oral Spray for Anticariogenic Purpose: Integration of Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction and Solvent System Optimization.Advances in pharmacological and pharmaceutical sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objective: The human nasal passages host major human pathogens. Recent research suggests that the microbial communities inhabiting the epithelial surfaces of the nasal passages play a key factor in maintaining a healthy microenvironment by affecting both resistance to pathogens and immunological responses. Colonization of the nasal cavity by different pathogens such as Methods: Several dilutions (2.0%, 1.0%, 0.5%, 0.25%, 0.1% and 0.09%) of commercially bought 10% (10 mg per 100 ml) povidone-iodine were prepared and tested against a standardized inoculum (1x10 Results: Povidone-iodine concentration of 0.25% exhibited ≥5 log reduction against Conclusion: Low povidone-iodine concentrations (i.e., 0.5% against
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.