Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40308789›Full record

ArticleActa medica Philippina2025

Lived Experiences of Health Workers in the Implementation of Soil-transmitted Helminthiasis Deworming Program in South Cotabato: A Phenomenological Inquiry.

Efren Ii C Deocades, Queen Jane M Bacon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta medica Philippina, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Efren Ii C DeocadesNotre Dame of Marbel University, City of Koronadal, South Cotabato, Philippines.
Queen Jane M BaconUniversity of Mindanao, Davao City, Philippines.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The deworming program, also known as preventive chemotherapy, is one of the most important strategies in combatting Soil-transmitted Helminthiasis. With more than two decades of implementation, only a few countries have reached the target deworming coverage of 75% by the World Health Organization (WHO). In the Philippines, the national deworming coverage from 2018 to 2022 is still below both the WHO and the Department of Health's target deworming coverage. As a result, there is an increasing prevalence of soil-transmitted helminthiasis among populations in endemic areas in the country including South Cotabato. Objective: The purpose of this qualitative study was to describe the experiences of health workers in the implementation of the STH deworming program in South Cotabato, specifically their lived experiences in implementing the deworming program, the challenges and issues they encountered during the implementation, coping strategies, and their insights about the status of the deworming program in the province and how to improve it. Methods: Seventeen health workers implementing the deworming program in the province of South Cotabato were interviewed through in-depth interviews and focus group discussions. Interviews were conducted online due to mobility restrictions during the pandemic. The transcripts were analyzed using Colaizzi's descriptive phenomenological method and essential themes were formulated. Results: Our analysis revealed that health workers' lived experiences revolve around ensuring the quality implementation of the program such as combatting misconceptions about deworming through house-to-house visitation and education campaigns, reaching far-flung areas, and ensuring children are in good health condition before taking a deworming medicine. Common challenges experienced by the participants were the misconceptions and disinformation regarding deworming, the limited and difficult access to some areas, problems in logistics, and the limited support of some stakeholders. Moreover, participants cited the importance of good community engagement, active involvement and commitment of stakeholders, providing support to health workers, and robust monitoring and evaluation of the program in improving the implementation of deworming. Conclusion: In the context of this study, there is still a need to intensify the training for implementers to cater more effectively to the concerns of the people and debunk misconceptions about the program. Utilization of various media for information dissemination, enhancing access to hard-to-reach areas, and strengthening community engagements, particularly with barangay and local government officials are essential to address the gaps in the implementation. There must also be improvements in monitoring and evaluation of the program, and additional support and incentives to healthcare workers to sustain implementations.

Indexed as

deworming programhealth workerslived experiencesphenomenological methodsoil-transmitted helminthiasis

Identifiers

PMID40308789
PMCPMC12037326

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.