ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2025
Drug-induced pancreatitis: a real-world analysis of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System and network pharmacology.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Post-marketing safety profile of bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide: a FAERS pharmacovigilance study with EudraVigilance validation and mechanistic investigation of pancreatitis.Virology journal · 2026Article
- Drug-induced adverse events in modern pharmacotherapy: mechanisms, clinical manifestations, and implications for risk assessment and management.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- A Case of Thiazide-Induced Pancreatitis.Cureus · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Drug-induced pancreatitis is a rare disease but frequently reported, owing to the vast number of medications. Aim: To summarize potential drugs causing pancreatitis and to speculate on underlying mechanisms. Methods: We extracted more than 60,000 reports of pancreatitis submitted to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (January 2004 to March 2023). Data on patient age, sex, weight, time to onset, and outcome (death et al.) were collected. Disproportionality analysis was used in data mining to identify associations between drugs and pancreatitis events. Seven databases, commonly used for network pharmacology analysis, were searched to identify potential targets. Results: Of 867 drugs with 3 or more reports, 101 drugs met all criteria using disproportionality analysis and indicated a potential risk of pancreatitis. The risk of 40 drugs had not been previously noted in "UpToDate" database. Patients taking the drugs had a similar sex distribution, were mostly 45-64 years old, and were heavier (median, 88 kg; P < 0.0001). The median time to onset was 199 days (interquartile range, 27-731.5). Ponatinib (16.48%), tigecycline (14.12%) and valproic acid (13.41%) had higher fatality rates. Potential targets related to pancreatitis were identified in 50 of the 101 drugs. Conclusion: Clinicians providing the 101 drugs for treatment should stay vigilant to detect pancreatitis early.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.