SynthesisFrontiers in pharmacology2025
Scoping review of ethnobotanical studies on
Synthesis in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Metabolomic Profiling of Medicinal Plant-Based Soft Porridge and Evaluation of Cytotoxicity.Metabolites · 2026Article
- A scoping review on ethnobotanical uses, pharmacological and toxicological profiles of traditional medicinal plants in paediatric healthcare across Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia.BMC complementary medicine and therapies · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Aim: This study critically reviews the ethnobotanical uses mainly focusing on traditional medicinal uses of Methods: A scoping review following the guidelines of Arksey and O'Malley was used to conduct this study. Various databases were used for searching for relevant articles and were handled in the reference manager EndNote. The data extraction focused on the links between Results: Of the 46 countries in Sub-Saharan Africa, only 14 have published studies on the ethnobotanical uses of Conclusion and recommendation: This scoping review provides a comprehensive overview of traditional healing practices using
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.