ArticleVideo journal of sports medicine
Endoscopic Repair of the Proximal Hamstring.
Article in Video journal of sports medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Proximal hamstring injuries are increasingly common. While open repair with suture anchors placed in the ischial tuberosity has long been the gold standard technique for surgical management, endoscopic techniques can allow for smaller incisions, reduced wound complications, and an expedited recovery. Indications: Patients with full-thickness 3-tendon proximal hamstring tears, 2-tendon tears with retraction >2 cm, or partial tears that remain symptomatic despite conservative management are considered for surgery. High-demand patients are often treated acutely, and low-demand patients may be offered surgery after a conservative management period. Technique Description: In the prone position, 2 arthroscopic portals are created in the gluteal fold. Fluoroscopy is used to verify safe portal placement, and the sciatic nerve is visualized along with the retracted tendon origin. The ischial tuberosity is identified, and the hamstring origin is debrided and decorticated. An accessory portal is created for suture anchor placement. Two double-loaded anchors are placed in the tuberosity, the sutures of which are used to repair the hamstring tendons using a horizontal mattress configuration. Patients undergo a stepwise postoperative physical therapy protocol. Results: An 85% return to sport rate can be expected following all hamstring repairs, with some studies reporting as high as 95% after endoscopic repair. Compared with nonoperative treatment, proximal hamstring repair overall results in higher patient satisfaction and return to sport. While large studies have yet to report on outcomes compared with the traditional open technique, the smaller incisions look to reduce wound complications and postoperative pain. Discussion/Conclusion: Recent advancements in endoscopic techniques have allowed for adequate visualization and robust repair of proximal hamstring avulsions. We present our endoscopic technique of the proximal hamstring, which, compared with the traditional open repair, can decrease perioperative complications and accelerate recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.