Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40308746›Full record

ArticleVideo journal of sports medicine

Matrix-Assisted Bone Marrow Stimulation: A Surgical Technique.

Christoph Lutter, Robert Lenz, Thomas Tischer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Video journal of sports medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Christoph LutterDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
Robert LenzDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
Thomas TischerDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3942-0235

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Microfracture is an established technique for cartilage regeneration but is limited by many factors such as small defect size, intralesional osteophytes, and lower quality of cartilage regeneration. Therefore, methods to improve results after microfracture like additional matrix augmentation or autologous cell addition are promising techniques. An all-arthroscopic surgical technique for matrix-augmented bone marrow stimulation will be presented here. Indications: Cartilage lesions of moderate size (>1 cm Technique Description: The arthroscopic procedure largely follows the standard microfracture technique. First, the cartilage defect is extensively debrided with removal of calcific cartilage layer. Stable cartilage margins have to be created with removal of all unstable fragments. The resulting well-defined defect is then measured with the use of a marking probe. The subchondral bone is then penetrated and opened using a microfracture awl. Next, the matrix based on hyaluronic acid (Hyalofast) is cut to the appropriate size. All joint fluid is removed, and the matrix is inserted through a previously placed canula and modeled into the defect with the probe. When the defect is well contained, no other fixation material is necessary. Otherwise, the matrix can be additionally fixed using fibrin clue. Cell application (dependent on regulatory issues) can be performed. Before closure, the joint should be moved to ensure safe fixation of the matrix. Results: Currently, there are only insufficient data to exactly define the defect size for microfracture or matrix-assisted bone marrow stimulation. Some studies show an advantage of using biomaterials compared with microfracture alone, but further studies are necessary. Discussion/Conclusion: The presented arthroscopic matrix-assisted bone marrow stimulation is a technically simple, inexpensive way of treating cartilage defects and should therefore be considered when treating affected patients. It can be used in a variety of joints. An additional combination with bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells might be promising but is subject to country-specific regulatory issues.

Indexed as

cartilagekneematrix augmentationmicrofractureshoulder

Identifiers

PMID40308746
PMCPMC11883634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.