Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40308716›Full record

ArticlePalliative medicine reports2025

Intensive End-of-Life Care: Implementation of a Canadian Guideline-Based Order Set for the Withdrawal of Life-Sustaining Therapy in the Intensive Care Unit.

Alison Knapp, Jennifer M O'Brien, Maria Cruz, Mary Ellen Walker, Joann Kawchuk, Carol Brons, Sabira Valiani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Palliative medicine reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alison KnappProvincial Department of Anesthesiology, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada.
Jennifer M O'BrienProvincial Department of Anesthesiology, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada.
Maria CruzProvincial Department of Anesthesiology, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada.
Mary Ellen WalkerProvincial Department of Anesthesiology, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada.
Joann KawchukProvincial Department of Anesthesiology, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada.
Carol BronsPatient and Family Partner, Saskatchewan Center for Patient Oriented Research, Saskatoon, Canada.
Sabira ValianiProvincial Department of Anesthesiology, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: An increasing number of patients receive end-of-life care in the intensive care unit (ICU). Death often occurs in the ICU after a decision has been made to withdraw life-sustaining therapies. In 2016, Downar et al. published Canadian consensus guidelines to standardize practices for withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy in the ICU. In this study, we sought to understand the feasibility and acceptability of implementing an order set, nursing flowsheet, and nursing care plan based on these guidelines in two ICUs in Saskatchewan, Canada. Methods: We used a hybrid effectiveness-implementation design, engaging a steering committee of ICU health care providers and leadership to guide implementation. We conducted a six-month pilot implementation. We collected data in the three months pre-implementation, during the six-month implementation period, and for three months post-implementation. To evaluate implementation outcomes, we used the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to develop semi-structured interviews and feasibility surveys. To measure effectiveness outcomes, bedside nurses completed Quality of Death and Dying surveys, and we performed a patient chart review. Results: The intervention materials added to the burden of paperwork of bedside health care providers but helped them provide quality end-of-life care, meet the needs of patients and their families, and lessen ethical tensions between symptom control and hastening death. There was no difference in cumulative sedative dosing and time to death after extubation in the pre-implementation, implementation, or post-implementation periods. A significant increase in symptom assessment (pain, dyspnea, and agitation) using standardized tools was observed during the implementation and post-implementation periods. There was an improvement in holistic care outcomes post-implementation. Conclusions: We implemented current Canadian best-practice guidelines for providing end-of-life care in the ICU using a multidisciplinary approach. This study offers insight into how standardized symptom assessment and medication titration can be incorporated into the complex ICU environment.

Indexed as

critical careend-of-life careICUimplementation sciencequality improvementwithdrawal of life-sustaining therapy

Identifiers

PMID40308716
PMCPMC12040528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.