ArticleResearch (Washington, D.C.)2025
Perfusion Parameter Map Generation from 3 Phases of Computed Tomography Perfusion in Stroke Using Generative Adversarial Networks.
Article in Research (Washington, D.C.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Generative Artificial Intelligence to Automate Cerebral Perfusion Mapping in Acute Ischemic Stroke from Non-contrast Head Computed Tomography Images: Pilot Study.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- TRIM21 Exacerbates Ischemic Brain Injury by Promoting Astrocyte-Mediated Neuroinflammation via K63-Linked Ubiquitination of MDA5.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Computed tomography perfusion (CTP) plays a crucial role in guiding reperfusion therapy and patient selection for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) through perfusion parameter maps of the brain; however, its widespread use is limited by the complexity of acquisition protocols and high radiation dose. Previous studies have attempted to reduce radiation exposure by equally lowering the temporal sampling rate; however, it may miss the peak of arterial enhancement, leading to underestimation of blood flow parameter. Here, we investigate the feasibility of using a generative adversarial network (GAN) to generate perfusion maps from 3 phases of CTP (mCTP). The three phases were chosen based on the multiphase computed tomography angiography scanning protocol: the peak arterial input function phase, the peak venous output function phase, and the delayed venous output function phase. The findings demonstrate that the GAN model achieved high visual overlap and performance for cerebral blood flow and time-to-maximum maps, with a mean structural similarity index measure of 0.921 to 0.971 and 0.817 to 0.883, a mean normalized root mean squared error of 0.019 to 0.108 and 0.058 to 0.064, and a mean learned perceptual image patch similarity of 0.039 to 0.088 and 0.141 to 0.146, respectively. For the 2 external datasets, the volume agreement between the model- and CTP-derived infarct and hypoperfusion areas was the intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.731 to 0.883 and 0.499 to 0.635, and the Spearman correlation coefficient of 0.720 to 0.808 and 0.533 to 0.6540, respectively. Qualitative assessments of diagnostic quality further confirmed that the mCTP-derived maps were comparable to those obtained from traditional CTP. In conclusion, the GAN-based model is effective in generating perfusion maps from mCTP, which could serve as a viable alternative to traditional CTP in the diagnostic evaluation of AIS.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.