Article3D printing and additive manufacturing2025
Toward a Digital Design Framework for the Thermal Tunability of 3D Printed Envelopes.
Article in 3D printing and additive manufacturing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Large-scale extrusion-based additive manufacturing (AM) has emerged as a potential alternative for construction, addressing the challenges associated with the high carbon footprint of the building industry. Although AM enables the creation of intricate design geometries through controlled material deposition, providing innovative solution strategies for design construction, large-scale 3D printed structures are limited to a single homogeneous material, such as cement or clay, and their functionality is restricted to load-bearing formwork. Although still at a nascent stage for building construction, multimaterial additive manufacturing (MMAM) has emerged as a promising technology for the industry to overcome this limitation and reduce the embodied carbon of 3D printed structures by limiting the use of structural materials through topology optimization strategies. MMAM enables the fabrication of functionally graded materials (FGMs) by controlling the extrusion ratio between two or more distinct materials, resulting in building envelopes with multiple performance characteristics and functions. While research has focused on improving the structural performance of 3D-printed envelopes through MMAM, limited attention has been given to optimizing thermal performance and energy efficiency. An increasing interest in thermal energy storage technologies for buildings using the latent heat storage capacity of microencapsulated phase change materials (mPCMs) is related to the advantages of improving energy efficiency using materials that can absorb, store, and release heat when their temperature changes. To this end, this study proposes an FGM design-to-construction methodology for large-scale structures that optimizes the thermal performance of 3D-printed envelopes by locally tuning the distribution of heterogeneous mixes of clay and mPCMs during the AM process. The results of the digital simulations and physical tests show that the local optimization of mPCM and clay within the wall thickness according to the specific temperature differential can provide annual energy reductions compared with a homogeneously printed envelope without embedded mPCM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.