Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40308656›Full record

Article3D printing and additive manufacturing2025

Designing with Printed Responsive Biomaterials: A Review.

Laia Mogas-Soldevila, Katia Zolotovsky

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in 3D printing and additive manufacturing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Laia Mogas-SoldevilaDumoLab Research, Department of Graduate Architecture, Stuart Weitzman School of Design, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6296-2617
Katia ZolotovskyDepartment of Art and Design & Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Boston Campus, Northeastern University Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8030-499X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review explores additive manufacturing (AM) strategies across disciplines for designing with responsive biomaterials and presents a vision of how printed responsive biomaterials (PRBs) can be integrated into everyday objects and buildings to enhance environmental and human health. Advancements in biomaterials science, biological materials manufacturing, synthetic biology, biomedical engineering, bio design, and living architecture are ushering in a new era characterized by multisensory interactions within everyday products and built environments. The material systems developed in recent research demonstrate the ability to interact with their environments through biological, chemical, or physical processes, yielding functionalities desirable in daily-use products. These include self-healing, health diagnostics, pathogen neutralization, adjustable stiffness, strain detection, threat visualization, shapeshifting, toxin trapping, stress correction, waste processing, and energy generation. Here we review examples of AM of biobased environmentally interactive materials using biopolymer composites, electrochemical and resistive devices, active molecules, bio sensors, living cells, spores, or cell-free sites, resulting in genetically active, and physical and chemical interactive systems. We highlight their robustness and evaluate their potential for scaling up into designs and architectures on Earth and beyond.

Indexed as

active matteradditive manufacturingbiomaterialsenvironmental interactionliving materialsresponsive materialssustainable systems

Identifiers

PMID40308656
PMCPMC12038318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.