Article3D printing and additive manufacturing2025
3D Printable Biocomposites with Tunable Environmental Degradability.
Article in 3D printing and additive manufacturing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The growing environmental impacts of solid waste accumulation have resulted in an increased demand for biodegradable alternatives to conventional plastics. While several products have begun to gain popularity as biodegradable or compostable plastics, these often still negatively impact terrestrial and aquatic environments, as they frequently require precise conditions in order to fully decompose. Furthermore, standards for measuring biodegradation rates are often complex and poorly representative of real disposal sites, limiting their widespread use and applicability. In this study, we present four simple tests to assess the environmental degradability of materials without specialized equipment and demonstrate them with a series of 3D printable biotic composites composed of pectin, chitosan, and cellulose, abundant and organic biopolymers known to be degradable by common microorganisms. Five different compositions were degraded in live soil, worm burial, high humidity, and aqueous environments, and demonstrated rapid degradation with up to 100% mass loss after 21 days for a pectin-based material buried in worm-laden oil. Degradability was further found to be tunable, with decreasing degradation rate as chitosan content increased. Our results confirm that biotic composites degrade more rapidly than conventional plastics and provide accessible methods that can enable more widespread material testing for the development of sustainable material alternatives, especially to gather basic environmental degradation information representative of typical solid waste discard conditions. We anticipate that these degradation methods and the materials degraded therein will provide further impetus for reducing waste from 3D printing and for considering end of life when designing products.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.