ReviewInternational journal of nanomedicine2025
Nanoparticle-Based Strategies to Enhance the Efficacy of STING Activators in Cancer Immunotherapy.
Review in International journal of nanomedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Timing matters: how mechanism-guided sequencing shapes the efficacy of radiotherapy-immunotherapy combinations : A systematic review.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2026Review
- Spotlight on cGAS-STING: role in disease pathogenesis and therapeutic potential.Molecular biomedicine · 2026Review
- CD109 is associated with an immunosuppressive microenvironment and M2 macrophage polarization: pan-cancer analysis and functional validation.BMC cancer · 2026Article
- Dual-Function Lipid-Based Nanovector Strategy for Glioblastoma Immunotherapy: STING Activation and M1 Microglia Polarization.Drug development research · 2026Review
- Engineering Immune Cell to Counteract Aging and Aging-Associated Diseases.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Illumination of Targeting Nanotherapeutics with Precision Eyes: From Optical to Radio-nanotheranostics.Theranostics · 2026Review
- STING-Activating Nanoparticles Combined with PD-1/PD-L1 Blockade: A Synergistic Approach in Cancer Immunotherapy.Biomedicines · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The cyclic GMP-AMP synthase (cGAS)-stimulator of interferon genes (STING) pathway plays a critical role in triggering innate and adaptive immune responses through type I interferon activation and immune cell recruitment, holding significant promise for cancer therapy. While STING activators targeting this pathway have been developed, their clinical application is hindered by challenges such as poor membrane permeability, rapid degradation, suboptimal pharmacokinetics, off-target biodistribution, and toxicity. Nanoparticle-based delivery systems offer a promising solution by enhancing the stability, circulation time, tumor accumulation, and intracellular release of STING activators. Furthermore, combining nanoparticle-delivered STING activators with radiotherapy, chemotherapy, phototherapy, and other immunotherapies enables synergistic antitumor effects through multimodal mechanisms, addressing resistance to monotherapies and reducing risks of recurrence and metastasis. This review outlines the immunomodulatory mechanisms of the cGAS-STING pathway, surveys current STING-targeted activators, and comprehensively discusses recent advances in nanoparticle-mediated delivery strategies for STING activation. Additionally, we explore combinatorial approaches that integrate STING-targeted nanotherapies with conventional and emerging treatments. Finally, we highlight the current status, prospects, and challenges of nanoparticle-based STING activation for cancer immunotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.