ArticleWorld journal of cardiology2025
Volatilome and machine learning in ischemic heart disease: Current challenges and future perspectives.
Article in World journal of cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06181799 (Biomarkers of the Exhaled Breath and Single-Lead Electrocardiography in the Diagnosis of Myocardial Ischemia), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Biomarkers of the Exhaled Breath and Single-Lead Electrocardiography in the Diagnosis of Myocardial Ischemia
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Myocardiocyte senescence in ischemic heart disease and breathome changes.World journal of experimental medicine · 2026Review
- Exhaled Breath Biomarkers Reflect the Inflammasome and Lipidome Changes in Ischemic Heart Disease: A Study Using Machine Learning Models and Network Analysis.Journal of lipid and atherosclerosis · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Integrating exhaled breath analysis into the diagnosis of cardiovascular diseases holds significant promise as a valuable tool for future clinical use, particularly for ischemic heart disease (IHD). However, current research on the volatilome (exhaled breath composition) in heart disease remains underexplored and lacks sufficient evidence to confirm its clinical validity. Key challenges hindering the application of breath analysis in diagnosing IHD include the scarcity of studies (only three published papers to date), substantial methodological bias in two of these studies, and the absence of standardized protocols for clinical implementation. Additionally, inconsistencies in methodologies-such as sample collection, analytical techniques, machine learning (ML) approaches, and result interpretation-vary widely across studies, further complicating their reproducibility and comparability. To address these gaps, there is an urgent need to establish unified guidelines that define best practices for breath sample collection, data analysis, ML integration, and biomarker annotation. Until these challenges are systematically resolved, the widespread adoption of exhaled breath analysis as a reliable diagnostic tool for IHD remains a distant goal rather than an imminent reality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.